| || |
|02-25-2009, 05:03 AM||#1|
Join Date: Jan 2009
I currently do not have a .308 of any type. Been looking at options, considering bolt actions and semi's.
Anybody have a review of the FNAR, I have a couple of BAR's, have always given good service, and been accurate.
|02-28-2009, 08:31 AM||#2|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Central FL
Reviews in the comments:
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008 ... -762x51mm/
http://www.shootingtimes.com/newproduct ... index.html
http://www.00buck.org/content/fnh-fnar- ... ner-review
Looks like an interesting gun, though I'm not wild about the pistol grip.
| || |
|11-08-2009, 11:23 AM||#4|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Republic of South Carolina
A shooting buddy of mine has one, heavy barrell. Not one you would want to shoot off-hand for an extended amount of time. On a rest or bi-pod it is very accurate with the $15 KMart scope he had on it. Seems solid and feels good to me. Only problem is the $50 mags and unknown reliability.
|11-21-2009, 06:50 PM||#5|
Join Date: Dec 2001
I don't get FN's recent releases...
Their overpriced tactical shotgun was nothing but a Winchester 1300 with AR-15 do-dads...
The FNAR is the Winchester semi auto with a heavy barrel, pistol grip, picatinny rail and a bigger mag. yawn.
If FN is going to rehash old ideas, why don't they do FAL work? They have to know that DSA has created an entire market around their platform.
|Search tags for this page|
fnar extended rail,
fnar picatinny rail,
fnar picatinny rail problems,
fnar rail problems,
fnar scope rail problems,
fnar top picatinny rail,
fnh fnar 308 problems,
picatinny rail for fnar
Click on a term to search for related topics.