![]() | |
![]() | #1 |
Member Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 39
| FNAR?
I currently do not have a .308 of any type. Been looking at options, considering bolt actions and semi's. Anybody have a review of the FNAR, I have a couple of BAR's, have always given good service, and been accurate. |
![]() |
![]() | #2 |
Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Central FL
Posts: 3,404
| Re: FNAR?
Reviews in the comments: http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2008 ... -762x51mm/ http://www.shootingtimes.com/newproduct ... index.html http://www.00buck.org/content/fnh-fnar- ... ner-review Looks like an interesting gun, though I'm not wild about the pistol grip. |
![]() |
![]() | #3 |
Member Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 39
| Re: FNAR?
Thanks!
|
![]() |
| |
![]() | #4 |
Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Republic of South Carolina
Posts: 335
| Re: FNAR?
A shooting buddy of mine has one, heavy barrell. Not one you would want to shoot off-hand for an extended amount of time. On a rest or bi-pod it is very accurate with the $15 KMart scope he had on it. Seems solid and feels good to me. Only problem is the $50 mags and unknown reliability.
|
![]() |
![]() | #5 |
Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Oklahoma-stan
Posts: 290
| Re: FNAR?
I don't get FN's recent releases... Their overpriced tactical shotgun was nothing but a Winchester 1300 with AR-15 do-dads... The FNAR is the Winchester semi auto with a heavy barrel, pistol grip, picatinny rail and a bigger mag. yawn. If FN is going to rehash old ideas, why don't they do FAL work? They have to know that DSA has created an entire market around their platform. |
![]() |