Black Rifles vs. Death Rays - Page 2 - Gun Hub
Gun Hub

Go Back   Gun Hub > Battle Rifles > Semi Auto

View Poll Results: Which would you prefer?
AR15 variant 5 10.64%
AK variant 0 0%
FAL variant 4 8.51%
G3 variant 2 4.26%
Death Ray 18 38.30%
Death Ray 18 38.30%
Voters: 47. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2004, 06:35 PM   #21
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Is this death ray hand held? or is it limited to a 'Technical' vehicle only?
 
Old 03-17-2004, 07:18 PM   #22
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 281
I'd like to know how he fills that squirt gun too
Seacowboys is offline  
Old 05-21-2004, 06:53 PM   #23
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 238
I wanted one of the Death Rays, but they're also prohibited in Canada.
koffeekruiser is offline  
 
Old 05-21-2004, 07:35 PM   #24
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seacowboys
I'd like to know how he fills that squirt gun too
It's easy, just siphon it out of the dog!
 
Old 05-21-2004, 10:02 PM   #25
ted
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,984
Im looking for a GAU-8/A Avenger mounted on a converted convertable Geo metro (sparkly green) with low profiles and fuzzy dice. Oh yeah...performance exaust is a must. And CD changer.
ted is offline  
Old 05-22-2004, 03:09 AM   #26
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 394
Each has it's place. Rail gun / laser / plasma / EMP weapons are still fairly infantile, but they are incresasing in power. Obviously, a rail gun cannot replace, say a FAL on the battlefield yet, but some amazing stuff is being done on a private basis.

This page has a lot of technical informatino, so you would probably wish to just skim it, but results are amazing. It will propel a 70-grain slug at about 220 FPS!

http://www.power-labs.com/multistagecg.htm
barmybrit is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 09:02 AM   #27
JR
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Northern Georgia
Posts: 9,290
Missing a couple of zeros? At 220 fps, it would be a great follow-on to the intensly lethal 5.56!!!



JR is offline  
Old 05-23-2004, 09:29 AM   #28
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 394
I meant 'amazing' as in how it is launched, not how lethal it is -- 220FPS is obviously far from 'amazing' in 'real' firearms!

What I find so amazing is the launcher is:
a) Silent
b) Produces no fumes
c) Power is easily adjustable
d) Was created by hand on a semi-amateur basis
e) The technology has only been researched for a matter of a few decades, as opposed to centuries

Now how many firearms can boast that?
barmybrit is offline  
Old 05-28-2004, 07:26 PM   #29
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 261
My vote to the G3/ FAL variants but always wanted to have a Bushy AR15 though (and still want one). Death rays?!?!?! Hmmmmmmm
M1A4me is offline  
Old 07-09-2004, 03:10 AM   #30
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 286
I wouldn't mind my M17s or G3 fitted with a matter/antimatter powered death ray. Also wouldn't mind an antiparticle beam launcher and antimatter missile launcher w/ it all.
$tinger is offline  
Old 07-09-2004, 04:38 PM   #31
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 34
Problems with energy weapon:
A. Physics dictate that what you put into something, is what you get out of it. A .25 acp-sized ray gun would not vaporize the Empire State Building.
B. With current technology, a laser weapon fires only one shot per battery. This would be like bringing an 1873 Trap Door Springfield to fight SS troops armed with MP44 assault rifles firing hundreds of bullets per minute.
C. An atomic power pack would provide more shots, but would blow up like a small nuke if hit with a projectile weapon.
D. Technologies could be devised to pin point destroy and destroy energy weapons. Say you had, an electricity thrower. What if your enemies trained dogs to bark and point out by smelling the ozone as it built up a charge?
What if a duster tank assigned to these dog units(driven by men, of course)hosed your general area with a thousand or more 40mm high explosive/incendiary shells in less than a minute?
Combat effectiveness, not "cool", should define our weaponry.
Also-what man invents, man can eventually defeat:
The machine gun ruled the trenches of WWI. But the submachinegun, BAR, and, tank ultimately knocked the MG off its throne.
Super weapons help to win wars. But they donot win wars by themselves.
Pug Puppy is offline  
Old 07-09-2004, 05:38 PM   #32
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 5,839
I'd take a Zat gun or a Staff Weapon over a AR anyday..... But the SGC teams need better AP ammo to use against the Jaffa as they seem to unload almost a full mag before one goes down.....



Death To the Goa'uld !!!!!!!!!!
HighPowerShooter is offline  
Old 07-10-2004, 02:28 AM   #33
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 286
I doubt if a nuke death ray would explode if hit by a projectile. Spread radiation, of course.
$tinger is offline  
Reply

  Gun Hub > Battle Rifles > Semi Auto

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I WANT TO GET A BLACK RIFLES? tankerfrank Semi Auto 43 07-05-2005 07:08 AM
RemDriLube in Black Rifles? skslover Semi Auto 4 11-16-2004 08:06 AM
Keeping black rifles black deltaheavy Semi Auto 7 08-28-2004 07:57 AM




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2020 Gun Hub. All rights reserved.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.