9th Circuit Court Carry Conceakled isn't a Right - Gun Hub
Gun Hub

Go Back   Gun Hub > Gun Hub Forum > Gun Rights

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-09-2016, 02:05 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
csmkersh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 10,764
Thumbs down 9th Circuit Court Carry Conceakled isn't a Right

From the most often reversed federal court


Appeals court rules no constitutional right to carry concealed guns | Fox News
csmkersh is offline  
Old 06-09-2016, 03:09 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
TommyGunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Morgan County, Alabama "In Dixie Land I'll take my stand."
Posts: 8,476
This is that über-liberal court in San Fransicko, right?
That one that's composed of libtards who think "the right of the people" means ...........absolutly nothing at all.
I doubt this survives a challenge brought to SCOTUS ... assuming it gets there.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg burntheconst..jpg (50.4 KB, 4 views)

Last edited by TommyGunn; 06-09-2016 at 03:12 PM.
TommyGunn is offline  
Old 06-09-2016, 06:15 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
bearcat6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,977
This is another example of why we can't let Shrillary appoint any supreme court justices. They will be there the rest of our lives.
bearcat6 is offline  
 
Old 06-10-2016, 04:04 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
TooTall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Benches of Utah
Posts: 2,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by TommyGunn View Post
This is that über-liberal court in San Fransicko, right?
That one that's composed of libtards who think "the right of the people" means ...........absolutly nothing at all.
I doubt this survives a challenge brought to SCOTUS ... assuming it gets there.
I'm not so sure about it Tommy. Strictly going by the division of the Supreme Court I can see it going to a 4 - 4 tie (Assuming it's ruled on before the next Justice is appointed) which will mean that the Circus court ruling stands.

I can't see it be rushed through that quickly of course which throws up right back to the current Presidential contest with the winner appointing the 9th judge and if heaven forbid Hillary wins you know she's not going to appoint a judge favorable to the Second Amendment.

This makes me glad I live in a will issue state.
TooTall is offline  
Old 06-10-2016, 07:18 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
TommyGunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Morgan County, Alabama "In Dixie Land I'll take my stand."
Posts: 8,476
Quote:
Originally Posted by TooTall View Post
I'm not so sure about it Tommy. Strictly going by the division of the Supreme Court I can see it going to a 4 - 4 tie (Assuming it's ruled on before the next Justice is appointed) which will mean that the Circus court ruling stands.

I can't see it be rushed through that quickly of course which throws up right back to the current Presidential contest with the winner appointing the 9th judge and if heaven forbid Hillary wins you know she's not going to appoint a judge favorable to the Second Amendment.

This makes me glad I live in a will issue state.
TooTall, you may be right.
But if the SCOTUS still believes in "stare decisis" (''it has been decided") then the Heller case should be upheld.
I've heard the argument on other forums with regards to this case that technically it may not be a bad decision "if"the jurisdiction allows open carry, since it is in that case, only banning one type of carry, not the entire right. I don't know enough about Cali gun laws..... IIRC some places allow open carry but the gun must be unloaded. Some good unloaded carry does.
I am glad I don't live on Kommie"fornia".

What I am most concerned about is the very real likelyhood Hillery is elected, because I forsee much grief ahead for the 2A community if that happens, as well as, in effect, 4 or 8 years MORE of an Obama-like government/economy.
And I have had enough of it, REALLY.
TommyGunn is offline  
Old 06-10-2016, 09:25 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern Nevada
Posts: 5,678
I expected this decision. Actually I've been expecting it ever since the 2 justice panel ruled that Heller includes CC, and various counties in CA started issuing permits.
Kevin Gibson is offline  
Old 07-31-2016, 08:56 PM   #7
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: MA
Posts: 75
If CONCEALED carry isn't a right, then open carry certainly is.

I remember something in the BOR to the Constitution about "...the (existing) right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."


It is explicit on the right to KEEP and BEAR arms, not being infringed.

So if the right isn't to carry concealed, it is certainly to BEAR arms openly.
Phenix is offline  
Old 08-01-2016, 07:54 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
stand watie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,882
Phenix,

The "moron left" doesn't want ANYONE to carry firearms & some of those dolts want to DISARM the POLICE, too.
(Their heads are EMPTY.)

yours, satx
stand watie is offline  
Reply

  Gun Hub > Gun Hub Forum > Gun Rights

Thread Tools
Display Modes





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2002 - 2020 Gun Hub. All rights reserved.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.