07-29-2009, 11:11 PM
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
[center:a9xq5114]Ninth Circuit Will Rehear Nordyke v. King En Banc[/center:a9xq5114] |
That's the decision in which the Circuit held that the Second Amendment was incorporated against the states, and also that counties could — despite that — bar guns from county property (at least the fairgrounds and the fairground parking lots involved in that particular challenge).
As is usual with decisions to take the case en banc, the order provides that 'The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.' This technically means that there's no longer a circuit split on the subject, which diminishes the likelihood of Supreme Court review of the Second and Seventh Circuit decisions rejecting incorporation. (The Seventh Circuit decision involved the Chicago handgun ban.) But those two circuit decisions stressed that they felt themselves bound by Supreme Court precedent. That precedent is old and inconsistent with modern incorporation approaches (as D.C. v. Heller itself acknowledged). And over two thirds of the states (including California) support certiorari on this question, and support incorporation. This suggests that there's still a very good chance that the Court will agree to hear the incorporation issue, notwithstanding the Ninth Circuit's decision to review the matter en banc.
En banc oral argument will take place during the third week of September.
While the Ninth Circuit encompasses California, the Chief Judge is the heroic Alex Kozinski. Look Westward Ho!